Organises working knowledge in an evolving guide and keeps a reentry point that lets the AI continue from relevant sources.
Preserve what makes work resumable: intent, reasons for decisions, acquired knowledge, actions performed and open questions. A short current entry reaches a sufficiently detailed guide so an assistant can continue through the method already formed.
Use this competence when a project crosses sessions, collaborators, interruptions or context reduction. Preserve the depth that would be costly or impossible to reconstruct.
A library prepares, continues and shares a workshop method
The library changes facilitator while preparing an accessible reading workshop.
Preserve the understanding from which work can continue, including why the method was formed and which contributions must still participate. A short entry reaches the accumulated guide and sources; it does not replace them. When a bounded next selection is already named, keep its identities and selection status so a later “continue” can be understood. Reentry combines this knowledge with present facts and the person’s current signal, preserving completed effects and local learning.
Adapt the method to your work and environment
Research, education, software, services and cultural projects supply different sources and choices. Bring the work, its existing knowledge and the means actually available. The library case teaches relationships that you can adapt; it does not prescribe your project.
A conversation can use the complete starter and return a guide to save. A file-enabled system can keep the whole kit and connect it through the environment’s native entry. An existing kernel can compose the pertinent contribution with its own competences and local learning.
Preserve reasons and capabilities alongside facts
Identify the selected work, who determines its direction and where its knowledge belongs. Reach the existing guide before creating another container. Keep each decision's reason: its supporting source or condition, what it makes possible and what could change it. Distinguish the person's words, observations, inferences and proposals. An open possibility can remain reachable without becoming the next assignment. When several competences must continue, preserve each contribution, why it remains pertinent and the method from which it resumes. A list of names does not transfer that capability.
A reentry point that reaches working knowledge
Keep a short current entry with objective, object, decisive sources, attained result, completed effects and next movement. Link it to the guide explaining intent, method, corrections and substantive passages. These are functions that can live in one document. Use the project's actual knowledge location, accessible to the recipient. If a page is regenerated, preserve reasons in a source regeneration will not overwrite. In a chat-only environment, return a complete note the person can save and bring to the next session.
Accumulate knowledge during work
Integrate a new reason, discovery or correction where it changes the method, while its relation is still understandable. Link to evidence instead of duplicating every log. When direction changes, update the continuation and retain attribution to the previous situation; do not imply that present understanding existed earlier. Preserve a decisive relation at risk before expanding sources further. Routine actions need no diary: retain what will change a decision or reentry.
Resume from the present
Compose the current request with the current entry, guide and necessary sources. Make the resumed relation recognizable. Recheck facts that may have changed when verification is pertinent and accessible. A previous summary is recovery evidence, not authority over the present. Preserve still-valid decisions and resolve differences through sources and the person's new signal. Do not repeat an effect already performed because a summary is incomplete. Keep authorization, results and proposals distinguishable. Proceed when the relation is sufficient, without habitually reloading the whole history.
When continuity improves its own method
The direct work is continuing a project. A meta relation becomes pertinent when experience changes how a competence organizes the knowledge needed for later work.
The relation becomes autological when continuity considers its own preservation method. A summary may have retained an outcome but lost a decision's reason; the method can learn to make that reason reachable. This does not imply unlimited memory or autonomous execution.
Resume the reasons, preparation and contributions that remain useful
Preserve the understanding from which work can continue, including why the method was formed and which contributions must still participate. A short entry reaches the accumulated guide and sources; it does not replace them. When a bounded next selection is already named, keep its identities and selection status so a later “continue” can be understood. Reentry combines this knowledge with present facts and the person’s current signal, preserving completed effects and local learning.
Continue through the actual project
When reentry requires a person to explain an already acquired relation again, determine whether the knowledge, its connection or use of the guide was missing. Correct that point in the project and, when reusable, in the continuity method.
A written guide makes knowledge available. A later, different case can show whether it is actually resumed. Retain what changes continuation; this learning concerns accessible documents and instructions, not changes to model weights.
Operating knowledge
Read OPERATING_GUIDE.md and EXAMPLES.md. With no file access, use the complete START_CHAT_EN.txt. The method composes with complementary project competences; actual tools, persistence and authorized effects belong to the receiving environment.
